Legal Opinion

Continental Securities Co. v. Yuma National Bank

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1918No. Civil No. 1615PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the county of Yuma. Frank Baxter, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJohn Wilson Ross, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment rendered in the superior court of Yuma county, wherein the plaintiff is appellee here, and the Continental Securities Company is appellant. In the original complaint the Yuma National Bank is named as plaintiff, and the Yuma Electric & Water Company, H. W. Blaisdell and the Continental Securities Company are named as defendants. The same parties are plaintiff and defendant, respectively, in the amended complaint.

The amended complaint was filed on the twenty-fifth day of November, 1916, and shows an action brought to obtain judgment against the defendants Yuma…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mares v. WormingtonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Smith Stage Co. v. EckertArizona Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Cresbard Grain Co. v. FarnhamSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Wilson v. BroadlickIndiana Court of Appeals · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API