Pasler v. Maryland Casualty Co.

Nichols, Judge.

The fact that the claimant was injured in an automobile collision while engaged in the business of the corporation and not because of any misconduct on his own part is undisputed, but it is contended, and has been contended throughout the litigation, that the claimant was not an employee within the meaning of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, as amended, and that he is therefore not entitled to compensation.

The evidence shows conclusively that the claimant is the sole shareholder and president of the employing corporation and that in addition to the duties imposed upon him by the…