Legal Opinion

State v. Armstrong

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided February 28, 1990No. Nos. 21,456-KA, 21,457-KAPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant, an attorney, was charged by bill of information with two counts of felony theft arising out of transactions involving funds collected on behalf of clients. While these charges were pending, the Bossier Parish District Attorney’s Office received additional complaints on behalf of defendant’s clients which made it apparent that defendant could be arrested on other theft charges. Pursuant to a plea agreement, the defendant pled guilty to two counts of felony theft, and in return the district attorney agreed not to file any additional charges arising out of similar circumstances…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. State v. BonannoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1980
  3. Townsend v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
  5. State v. LanclosSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1982

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. MotonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. State v. EmersonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. State v. BrantleyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. State v. HalleyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. State v. BruceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API