Legal Opinion
FOREMOST INS. CO., INC. v. Ingram
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided March 7, 1977No. 16PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Justice.
The primary question for review in present case is the interpretation to be placed upon G.S. 58-131.3A [1975 Sess. Laws, c. 670, s. 1] which provides:
“Premium discount for proper mobile home tie-down.— The Commissioner is authorized and directed to implement not less than a ten-percent (10%) discount from the insurance premium otherwise applicable to be allowed in diminution of the premium charged insureds under mobile-home owner policies and mobile-homeowner’s policies where the mobile home covered by the policy has been properly secured in accordance with regulations of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Stevenson v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State ex rel. Commissioner of Insurance v. North Carolina Fire Insurance Rating BureauSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- In Re a Filing Made by the North Carolina Fire Insurance Rating BureauSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- State ex rel. Commissioner of Insurance v. North Carolina Automobile Rate Administrative OfficeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Liguori v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1978
- State ex rel. Com'r of Ins. v. North Carolina Rate BureauCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- State ex rel. Commissioner of Insurance v. North Carolina Rate BureauCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- In re: NC Rate BureauCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- NAPCO, INC. v. LANDMARK TECHNOLOGY A, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2021