Legal Opinion

Certain London Market Insurance Companies v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 14, 2004No. 03-60664PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM: *

Certain London Market Insurance Companies, Allianz Insurance Company and *885Zurich American Insurance Company (“Certain London”) appeal the district court’s judgment in favor of Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance Company (“Pennsylvania National”) declaring that it was not required to defend or indemnify Certain London under the insurance policy involved in this case. We AFFIRM.

1. Background

In March 1998, Performance Fiberglass & Linings (“Performance”) purchased a Commercial General Liability policy (the “Policy”) from Pennsylvania National. The following month,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Forbush v. J C Penney CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  2. American Totalisator Company, Inc. v. Fair Grounds Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  3. Carr v. CRABTREEMississippi Supreme Court · 1951
  4. James Robert Crosby v. The General Tire & Rubber Company, Defendant-Third-Party v. Vulcan Painters, Inc., Etc., Etc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  5. Endrias Gebreyesus, Doing Business as Oda Trading Agency v. Fc Schaffer & Associates, Inc., and Mesfin Gebreyes Kifle Gebre., Fc Schaffer & Associates Inc, and Mesfin Gebreyes Kifle Gebre v. Endrias Gebreyesus, Doing Business as Oda Trading AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Roy Anderson Corp. v. Transcontinental InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API