Legal Opinion

Kelley Bros. & Spielman v. Diamond Drill & Machine Co.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 29, 1903PublishedCited by 7 opinions

No. 12. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The following are the figures referred to in the opinion;

1Opinion of the Court

BUFFINGTON, District Judge.

In the court below the Diamond Drill Machine Company, assignee of patent No. 433,791, for a coil clasp, granted to Calvin Jackson, August 5, 1890, brought suit against Kelley Bros. & Spielman charging infringement of its seventh claim, and from a decree adjudging infringement thereof the respondents took the present appeal. The particular application of the coil clasp here involved is to leather and other belting used- in transmitting power in machinery. Prior to the patent in suit, connection between the ends of leather belting was generally made by interlacing…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Eclipse MacH. Co. v. J. H. Specialty Mfg. Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1933
  2. Birdsboro Steel Foundry & Machine Co. v. Kelley Bros. & SpielmanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1906
  3. Diamond Drill & Machine Co. v. Kelley Bros. & SpielmanU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1905
  4. Kelley v. Diamond Drill & Machine Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1905
  5. Kelley v. Diamond Drill & Machine Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1904

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API