Legal Opinion

Michigan Air Line Railway v. Hustina

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1931No. Docket No. 24, Calendar No. 34,511PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.

The action is ejectment. Defendants claim title by adverse possession.

In 1880, Thomas Peach conveyed to plaintiff’s predecessor a right of way 100 feet wide across lot 4 in Stephen Baldwin’s addition to the city of Pontiac, 50 feet on each side of the line of the railway. About ten years later, a fence was erected some 25 feet from the center of the track. Beyond the fence the balance of the 50-foot strip was marshy, and, in practical effect, constituted part of a field. There was some indefinite testimony that at times cattle pastured on the 25-foot strip beyond the fence and that it was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Paldi v. PaldiMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Humphrey v. HurdMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Nugent v. PetermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hogan v. Egyptian Portland Cement Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Carney v. LovedayMichigan Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API