Legal Opinion

Mayfield v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 9, 1926PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDigges, J.

The single question for decision in this case is, Can the appellee convey, a good and marketable title to the appellant for the land described in the contract of sale entered into between them, dated July 29, 1925 ? There is no question that this contract is legal and binding upon the parties thereto if the appellee can convey such a title as the law requires-the appellant to accept. In order to determine this question we must review the title of the appellee and its predecessors. The record discloses that by deed dated July1 28th, 1796, the then owners of this property conveyed the same to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Church Extension of the Methodist Episcopal Church v. Smith ex rel. GuerkeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1881
  2. Dashiell v. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1822
  3. Gump v. SibleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1894
  4. Wilderman v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1855
  5. Needles v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1871

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mayor of Ocean City v. TaberCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  2. Salem Church v. NumsenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API