Legal Opinion

Wightman v. People

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1873PublishedCited by 5 opinions

ERROR to the Court of General Sessions of the city and county of New York, to review a judgment of conviction for grand larceny.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Brady, J.

The plaintiff in error was indicted for grand larceny, and convicted. On the trial the only exception taken was to the following question: “State whether the prisoner, Wightman, said anything to you as to being in company with David C. Hill at Cortland street on the night in question ?•” This inquiry was in rebuttal, the plaintiff in error having sworn that he was not at the ferry at the foot of Cortland street where the crime was alleged to have been committed; and it is conceded that if that be any evidence in the case imputing crime to him the exception is valueless.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cancemi v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  2. Maurer v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  3. People v. HaddenNew York Supreme Court · 1846

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Diaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Grove v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1925
  3. Bonar v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  4. Diaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  5. Grove v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API