Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Ex Parte Gadsden Country Club

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 16, 2009No. 1071270Published

1ConcurrenceBolin, Justice

I agree with the majority that GCC does not have a clear legal right to a writ of mandamus because GCC’s defense is not an affirmative defense and I am disinclined to expand mandamus review to a defense other than an affirmative defense. However, I write to address whether the administrative officer for the Department of Industrial Relations (“DIR”), in ultimately awarding Hurst unemployment compensation, in fact rejected GCC’s contention that Hurst’s employment was terminated because he left work without seeking medical attention after his accident. The relevant portion of DIR’s decision is…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sargent v. Director, State Department of Industrial RelationsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API