Legal Opinion
Oppenheimer v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 18, 1938PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGlennon, J.
Upon the argument of this case it was agreed that the only point which remained for consideration was the sufficiency of the third cause of action as pleaded, the parties having stipulated for reversal upon the other grounds recited in the notice of appeal. The allegations with which we are concerned read as follows:
“ Twenty-sixth. The sale of the participation certificates herein-before referred to to plaintiffs was a sale of goods within the Sales Act of the State of New York.
“ Twenty-seventh. The warranties made by defendant to induce the purchase of the said participation certificates…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wills v. Investors Bankstocks Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Rector v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Rector, Wardens & Vestrymen of the Church of Saint Matthew & Saint Timothy v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
3Cited by2 opinions
- Amsterdam Savings Bank v. Marine Midland BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Lehman Bros. Holdings, Inc. v. National BankDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2012