Legal Opinion

Diresta v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 5, 2003No. 5D03-2927Published

1Opinion of the CourtMonaco, J.

Adam Diresta petitions for a writ of habeas corpus seeking a belated appeal with respect to two orders of the trial court disposing of his post-conviction motions. We conclude that he is entitled to a belated appeal on one, but not the other.

Mr. Diresta was convicted after jury trial of three violent crimes and received a lengthy prison sentence as a consequence. His direct appeal resulted in a per curiam affirmance, and a mandate was issued with respect to it on August 25, 2000.1 His subsequent Rule 3.850 Motion for Post-Conviction Relief was denied by the trial court on June 25, 2001,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gaskin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  2. Ramirez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  3. Simpkins v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API