Legal Opinion

Turner v. Wells, Fargo & Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1894No. 418PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the district court of the third judicial district, Hon. Chas. S. Zane, Judge. Action of Martha Turner against Wells, Fargo & Company to recover a sum of money on deposit with defendant, and which she claimed was assigned to her by Minnie Barton, the depositor. Frank Kimball, special administrator of the estate of Minnie Barton, intervened, and from the judgment for plaintiff, appeals.-

1Opinion of the Court

MeeRIti, C. J.:

In the court below, this case and the two cases of Martha Turner, plaintiff and respondent, v. Union National Bank, defendant, and Frank Kimball, intervenor and appellant, and also the case of Martha Turner, plaintiff and respondent, v. The Utah Title Insurance & Trust Company, defendant, and Frank Kimball, intervenor and appellant, were tried together. The same evidence was heard and considered. The findings of fact and conclusions of law and the exceptions were substantially the same, and the same objections and exceptions to the admission of evidence, and the same assignment…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Turner v. Utah Title Insurance & Trust Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Petal Gas Storage, L.L.C. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
  2. Adams v. WagonerNevada Supreme Court · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API