Pullman Co. v. Industrial Commission
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Farthing
A writ of error has been awarded by this court to review the record in this case. The record shows that the defendant in error, Joseph IT. Bertolin, (hereinafter called the employee,) was employed, and had been for more than a year prior to December 5, 1930, by the Pullman Company, plaintiff in error (hereinafter called the employer). On September 15, 1931, at a hearing before an arbitrator of the Industrial Commission the parties stipulated that they were operating under the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation act of Illinois on December 5, 1930; that on that date the relation of master…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Postal Telegraph Cable Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1931
- Savin v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1930
- Biker v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1928
3Cited by4 opinions
- Crane Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1965
- Springfield Park District v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
- Silke v. WalterNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
- Trepanier v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1950