Legal Opinion
People v. Rath
New York District Court
Decided September 25, 2013PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Andrew M. Engel, J.
The defendant was charged with driving while intoxicated per se, driving while intoxicated, disobeying a traffic control device, making an unsafe lane change, failing to use due care for an emergency vehicle and failing to wear a seat belt, in violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law §§ 1192 (2) and (3), 110 (a), 1128 (a), 1144 (a) and 1229-c (3), respectively.
The matter was tried before a jury and this court (Engel, J.) on May 15, 16, 17, 20 and 21, 2013. During trial the court granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the charges of disobeying a traffic…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- People v. SchwartzmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- People v. StevensNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- People v. FordNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Schozer v. William Penn Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- People v. MertzNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- The People v. Roy S. KangasNew York Court of Appeals · 2016
- People v. SanchezCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2015