Ex parte Bernert
California Supreme Court
Application for release on writ of habeas corpus.
1Opinion of the Court
MgKixstrt, J.:
The petitioner was convicted in the Police Court of San Francisco (and adjudged to pay a find of $20, and, in default of payment thereof, to be imprisoned in the county jail for the period of ten days) of the offense of violating an ordinance entitled “Order No. 1589,” portions of which are as follows:
“ Section 1. Every person who shall violate any of the provisions of this order shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and, upon conviction thereof, shall be punished by a fine of not more than one thousand dollars, or by imprisonment not more than six months, or by both.”
“…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bigelow v. ForrestSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- People v. TurleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
- People v. YbarraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- People v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
- Barada v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1850
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- People v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Matter of SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- In Re ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- In Re BouchardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
- Ex parte SotoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.