Legal Opinion

Leo v. Maro Display, Inc.

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided March 7, 1980No. 79-217-AppealPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelleher, J.

This is a workers’ compensation case in which the employee contends that he is entitled to triple damages because his work-related injury occurred at a time when he was a minor. Both the trial commissioner and the appellate division of the Workers’ Compensation Commission rejected this contention, and so do we.

The facts are uncontradicted. The employee received serious job-related injuries to his left hand at 12:45 p.m. on August 3, 1977. He was born on August 3, 1959, at 3:56 p.m. Everyone agrées that the employee would not be entitled to triple damages if he were eighteen as of 12:45 p.m.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Firing v. KephartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  3. Nelson v. SandkampSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  4. William Neil Turnbull v. Josephine Bonkowski and Leonard KingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  5. Mathewson v. HamSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1899

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Golderese v. Suburban Land Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1991
  2. State v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1997
  3. In Re EdwardSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1982
  4. Ellingham v. MortonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  5. Burke v. Rhode Island CollegeSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API