Legal Opinion

Olivares v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 1, 1932No. 15286PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is malicious prosecution; the punishment, a fine of $100.

The complaint recites that affiant has good reason to believe, etc., but omits the phrase “and does believe.” The inclusion of this last named allegation is statutory. Article 222, subd. 2, C. C. P. Its omission renders the complaint fatally defective. Ward v. State, 121 Texas Crim. Rep., 260, 21 S. W. (2d) 297, and authorities cited.

The complaint is further defective in failing to follow the language of article 1298, Penal Code, defining the offense. This article reads as follows: “Whoever * * * with intent…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ward v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929
  2. Ward v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Phillipps v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1934
  2. Lopez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1938
  3. Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1939
  4. Oliver v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API