Legal Opinion
Department of Human Services v. S. M.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided April 3, 2013No. J110590; Petition Number 100311MCG1; A151376; J110591; Petition Number 100311MCG2; A151377; J110592; Petition Number 100311MCG3; A151378; J110593; Petition Number 100311MCG4; A151379; J110594; Petition Number 100311MCG5; A151380; J110595; Petition Number 100311MCG6; A151381; J110596; Petition Number 100311MCG7; A151386; J110597; Petition Number 100311MCG8; A151388PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, P. J.
In this dependency case, the juvenile court asserted jurisdiction over parents’ eight children based on the court’s determination that the children’s conditions and circumstances endangered their welfare. ORS 419B.100(l)(c). At a subsequent review hearing, the Department of Human Services (DHS) asked the juvenile court to order the immunization of the children over mother’s and father’s religious objections to the children’s immunization. The court granted DHS’s request and issued a review judgment for each child that provided that the children “may be immunized over the parents’ objection…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- In Re Marriage of O'Donnell-LamontOregon Supreme Court · 2004
- Steeves v. Scotland Cty. Bd. of HealthSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
- In the Interest of C. R.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
3Cited by4 opinions
- Department of Human Services v. S. M.Oregon Supreme Court · 2014
- Department of Human Services v. D. W. C.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- Dept. of Human Services v. T. M. G.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
- In re the Marriage of EplerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013