Legal Opinion

Braidfoot v. Taylor

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 19, 1881No. 1815, Op. Book No. 3, p. 541Published

Appeal from Baylor County.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

White, P. J.

§ 174. Certiorari; sufficient ground for. That the judgment complained of was rendered by the justice at a time other than when by law a regular term of his court could be held, is a sufficient ground for certiorari, because such judgment would be without authority. [R. S. art. 303.]

§ 175. Certiorari bond; variance. In the body of a certiorari bond the judgment was described as one rendered against Thomas Braidford, and he was named as principal in the bond, but the bond was signed Thomas Braidfoot, and Braidfoot, and not Braidford, was the name of the real plaintiff in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Keeton v. SpradlingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1850
  2. Morgan v. ThriftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1852
  3. Taylor v. StricklandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1861
  4. Donaho v. CoitTexas Supreme Court · 1841

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API