Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Edgell

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1972No. 71-106Published

1DissentO’Neill, C. J.

I find the majority position inconsistent. On the one hand, they find the events occurring in Guernsey County irrelevant on both the Miranda and voluntariness issues, and on the other hand they find defendant’s oral confession in Guernsey County the major support for a holding of harmless error. A determination of harmless error can only be predicated upon evidence or testimony which itself is constitutionally admissible. Moreover, as will be more fully developed herein, I dispute the majority’s determination that the motion to suppress was directed solely to the taped statement.

Prior to…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Haynes v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API