In re Teitelbaum
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1976. He maintains an office for the practice of law in the hamlet of Slingerlands, Albany County.
Respondent has not answered or otherwise replied to a petition of charges or to petitioner’s subsequent motion for a default judgment, both of which were personally served upon him. In support of its motion, petitioner has filed proof by affidavit with supporting exhibits of the facts constituting the alleged professional misconduct. Under such circumstances, respondent is deemed to have admitted the charges, and we grant petitioner’s motion…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In re DaytonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- In re TangAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008