Legal Opinion

Kingsley v. Delano

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 22, 1898PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Contract, upon an account annexed, against the exécutor of the will of Henry B. Graves. After the former decision, the defendant filed a motion in arrest of judgment, which was overruled in the Superior Court; and he appealed to this court.

1Opinion of the CourtField, C. J.

This case has once before been considered by this court on exceptions, and is reported in 169 Mass. 285. After the decision there reported, the plaintiff elected to remit $20, the price of the mare, and the defendant then filed a motion in arrest of judgment, which was overruled, and he appealed to this court. The action was begun in the District Court of Hampshire, and the declaration contained a single count, being on an account annexed. Judgment was rendered in that court for the plaintiff for $3 damages and the costs of suit. The plaintiff’s claim was for $146.60 and interest. From this…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Vinal v. SpoffordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
  2. Folsom v. CornellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  3. Kingsley v. DelanoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
  4. Smith v. DickinsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
  5. Shepard v. City of LawrenceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Shaheen v. HershfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  2. Cameron v. KanrichMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API