Legal Opinion

Irvindale Farms Inc. v. W. O. Pierce Dairy Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 3, 1949No. 32149PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSutton, C. J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) Each of the notes sued on contained the following provision: “This note is one of a series of twenty three, due monthly, serially and consecutively and aggregating $19,159.00, given in pursuance and subject to the terms of a contract even date herewith.” The contract referred to is set out in full in the above statement of facts. It was between W. 0. Pierce Dairy Inc. and W. 0. Pierce, individually, of the first part, and Irvindale Farms Inc., of the second part, and paragraph 4 thereof provided: “Parties of the first part agree and bind themselves to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Montgomery v. HuntSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  2. Griswold v. ScottSupreme Court of Georgia · 1853
  3. Wardlaw v. WoodruffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
  4. Martin v. LottSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  5. Allison v. DunwodySupreme Court of Georgia · 1896

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Clark's Super Gas, Inc. v. Tri-State Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  2. Griffin v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  3. Ameritrust Company, N. A. v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
  4. ABCO Builders, Inc. v. Peavy Concrete Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  5. Faust v. General Finance & Loan Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API