Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. Witherick

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 30, 1882PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for McLeod county, Macdonald, J., presiding, refusing a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

Action for slander. The allegations of the complaint, so far as here material, are that “in a conversation with this plaintiff’s wife, * * and * * * in the presence and hearing of” third persons, the defendant spoke and declared “of and concerning the said plaintiff” the following words: “ ‘ You have not sworn falsely, but) your husband,’ (meaning this plaintiff,) che’ (meaning this plaintiff) ‘ has sworn falsely in the case with my brother;’ meaning that this plaintiff had sworn falsely in a lawsuit between this defendant and his brother.” The words charged to have been spoken are not…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rue v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1790
  2. Brace v. BrinkMichigan Supreme Court · 1875

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Shattuc v. McArthurU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1885
  2. Radke v. KolbeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  3. Casselman v. WinshipSupreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota · 1884

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API