Legal Opinion · Dissent

Seale Motor Co. Inc. v. Stone

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 28, 1950No. 16450Published

1DissentFishburnE, Justice

*382I regret that I must record a dissent to the leading opinion in this cause, but I cannot agree that the acknowledgment to the title retention contract under consideration is fatally defective. This acknowledgment reads as follows:

“State of Kentucky,

County of Perry:

I, Carl M. Seale, D. C. in and for the county and state aforesaid, certify there came before me in said County and State......Perry, Ky., who produced the foregoing contract and acknowledged same to be his act and deed in due form of law.

Witness my hand this 20 day of January, 1949.

Prentiss Baker Clerk, P. C.

By: Carl M. Seale, D. C.

N…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wells v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877
  2. Arthur v. HollowellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API