State ex rel. Wineman v. Dahl
North Dakota Supreme Court
■ Mandamus, on the relation of J. B. Wineman, to compel C. M. Dahl, secretary of state, to certify to the county auditors of the various counties of the state a joint resolution passed by the legislature, that the question whether a constitutional convention shall be held shall be submitted to the people.
1Opinion of the CourtCorliss, J.
An alternative writ of mandamus having been issued by this court in the exercise of its original jurisdiction, the defendant appeared and answered th$ writ. A demurrer having been interposed to such answer, the case presents to us only questions of law. The object of this proceeding is to compel the defendant, as secretary of state, to certify to the county auditor of each county a certain joint resolution adopted at the last session of the legislature. It is in the following words: “Concur*82rent Resolution. Be it resolved by the house of representatives of the State of North Dakota, the senate…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hollingsworth v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
3Cited by17 opinions
- Ellingham v. DyeIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
- Norris v. Cross, Secretary of StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- McConaughy v. Secretary of StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
- Opinion of the Court to the Governor in the Matter of the Constitutional ConventionSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1935
- State ex rel. Birdzell v. JorgensonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.