Legal Opinion

Farrar v. Shuss

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 5, 1926PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBland, J.

This is an appeal from the action of the court in sustaining a demurrer to plaintiffs ’ petition. The first count of the petition alleges that plaintiffs, in June-, 1923, were the owners and were in the possession of certain land in Grundy county devoted to farming and stock raising; that defendants—. . wholly disregarding" plaintiffs’ rights, and injury and damage they might and indeed have and will continue to suffer, until the reservoir or pool nuisance hereinafter complained of, is abated; about the - day of June, A. D. 1923, erected, or caused to be erected, placed, made, created and…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Paddock v. SomesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
  2. Goll v. Chicago & Alton Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1917
  3. Mallinckrodt Chemical Works v. NemnichSupreme Court of Missouri · 1902
  4. Rychlicki v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1889
  5. Grant v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1910

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Hardin v. Norborne Land Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  2. White v. Wabash Railroad Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1947
  3. Dudley Special Road District v. HarrisonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Hawkins v. Burlington Northern, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1974
  5. Hawkins v. Burlington Northern, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API