Boardman v. Kendrick
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
McGHEE, Justice.
As this appeal comes to us it involves mineral interests under lands, some of which were acquired under federal homestead laws, and others by purchase, by Jewell Boardman and her then husband as community property. The trial court decreed the plaintiffs, Jewell Boardman and her son H. J. Boardman, Jr., were the owners in fee simple of the following described mineral interests and quieted their title thereto:
All oil, gas and other minerals in and under the SE14 and the Ei^ of SW^, of Section 8; and the Wj4 of the SWJ4 of Section 9; and an undivided %ths of the minerals in and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Peugh v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Pitek v. McGuireNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1947
- Union Land & Grazing Co. v. ArceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1915
- Palmer v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1914
- Alexander v. ClelandNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1906
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Roybal v. MorrisNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1983
- Raulie v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
- Velasquez v. MascarenasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
- Homes by Marilynn v. RobinsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
- Bell v. WareNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.