Legal Opinion · Dissent

Park v. Park

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided September 3, 1999No. S-8700Published

1Dissent

• FABE, Justice,

with whom CARPENETI, Justice, joins, dissenting.

I. INTRODUCTION

I disagree with the court’s conclusion that the superior court’s findings were inadequate. Both the superior' court’s findings and the trial record in this case reveal that the trial judge considered all relevant and disputed statutory factors and came to a sound custody decision. I therefore respectfully dissent.

II. DISCUSSION

As we articulated in Borchgrevink v. Bor-chgrevink,1 the standard of review for alleged inadequacy of a trial court’s factual findings is “whether they give a clear indication of the factors…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Borchgrevink v. BorchgrevinkAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Julsen v. JulsenAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Maloney v. MaloneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  4. Bird v. StarkeyAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Lee v. CoxAlaska Supreme Court · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API