Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

People v. McCarthy

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 23, 1989No. 1-85-2485Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJustice Pincham

While I concur in the majority’s holding that the trial court erred in refusing to give a voluntary manslaughter instruction and in the reversal of the defendant’s murder conviction and remandment for a new trial, I dissent to the majority’s holdings that evidence of the defendant’s “other crimes or bad acts” was admissible against the defendant and “there was no error in the denial of the testimony of the mental health therapist regarding defendant’s state of mind 11 days prior to Adrienne’s death.” 181 Ill. App. 3d at 213.

The deceased, Adrienne Neal, discontinued living with the defendant,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. LindgrenIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  2. People v. BarbourAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  3. People v. DavisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  4. People v. MillerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  5. People v. HarrisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API