Yarbrough v. State
Court of Appeals of Mississippi
1ConcurrenceJames, J.
¶23. I concur with the majority opinion in the result. However, I would find that the dispositive issue is whether the trial court erred in finding that Yar-brough waived the conflict of interest. The majority opinion, along with the trial court, concluded that an actual conflict existed. The trial court found that Yar-brough waived the conflict. The majority opinion ultimately concluded that Yar-brough did not waive the conflict. I am of the opinion that Yarbrough waived the conflict; however, it was not knowingly and intelligently made, and thus the waiver was not valid or effective.5 Also,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Littlejohn v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
- Armstrong v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
- Kiker v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2011
- Yarbrough v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.