Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re AK

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 12, 1990No. 88-441Published

1Opinion of the Court

571 A.2d 75 (1990)

In re A.K.

No. 88-441.

Supreme Court of Vermont.

January 12, 1990.

Jeffrey L. Amestoy, Atty. Gen., Montpelier, and Michael O. Duane, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Barbara L. Crippen, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Waterbury, for plaintiff-appellee.

Walter M. Morris, Jr., Defender Gen., Kenneth A. Schatz, Deputy Defender Gen., and Henry Hinton, Appellate Defender, Montpelier, for defendants-appellants.

Martin & Paolini, Barre, for juvenile.

Before ALLEN, C.J., PECK and DOOLEY, JJ., and CONNARN, District Judge (Ret.) and SPRINGER, District Judge (Ret.), Specially Assigned.

ALLEN, Chief Justice.

The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re MullesteinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
  2. Sinhogar v. ParryNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. In Re Green Mountain Power Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1987
  4. Eason v. Welfare CommissionerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
  5. In re A.K.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API