Legal Opinion

Claim of Hurley v. E. R. Wolcott, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 24, 1967PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReynolds, J.

Appeal by the employer and its carrier from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board granting claimant an award for 100% loss of vision in his right eye. Claimant sustained a work-connected injury to his right eye which required surgery, as a result of which all of the experts agree claimant suffered a 100% loss of vision. There is also unanimity by said experts, however, that, except for a partial loss of binocular vision which loss is clearly not compensable (Matter of Gainey v. Warren Nash Motor Corp., 231 App. Div. 768) by the use of a corrective lens claimant’s vision was at least…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Claim of McNamara v. McHarg, Barton Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  2. Claim of Gainey v. Warren Nash Motor Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Aerosol Corporation of the South v. JohnsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Claim of Mealing v. HillsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  3. Claim of Pulaski v. Shatsky Metal Stamping Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API