Legal Opinion

Renzi v. Case Manangement Concepts

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 17, 2009PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.

Claimant sustained a compensable injury in 1998. In 2006, the claim became the liability of the Special Fund for Reopened Cases pursuant to Workers’ Compensation Law § 25-a. In 2008, a licensed massage therapist began submitting requests for payment for massage therapy performed on claimant that had allegedly been prescribed by claimant’s treating physician. The Special Fund objected, contending that licensed massage *1389therapists are not authorized providers under the Workers’ Compensation Law. Following a hearing, a Workers’ Compensation Law Judge (hereinafter WCLJ) determined that massage…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Claim of Monzon v. Sam Bernardi Construction Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. Claim of Baker v. Horace Nye HomeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  3. Claim of Evevsky v. Liberty Mutual GroupAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cohen v. New York State Workers' Compensation BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  2. Cohen v. New York State Workers' Compensation BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API