Commonwealth v. Supertzi
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Price, J.,
In June, 1973, one Richard Tenney, and the appellee, David Supertzi, were indicted for the crimes of resisting arrest, obstructing justice, assault and battery, and inciting a riot. 1 At the end of the Commonwealth’s case, the appellee’s demurrer to the evidence was sustained and the Commonwealth appealed. We reverse.
Accepting all facts which the Commonwealth’s evidence tended to prove, and all inferences reasonably deducible therefrom, Act of June 5, 1937, P.L. 1703, No. 357 (19 P.S. §481), reveals that on the night of April 17, 1973, in the City of Pittsburgh, Police…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bad Elk v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Commonwealth v. JeffriesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Miller v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. RichardsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
- Commonwealth v. VassiljevSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Steven Wise Wright and Clarence Edward Wright, Jr. v. George Bailey and Raymond L. BellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976
- Glover v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1991
- Commonwealth v. Hinzy, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Somerset County1981