Legal Opinion

McLaughlin v. Interurban Street Railway Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 15, 1905PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff, Joseph McLaughlin, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the defendant, entered in the office

1Opinion of the Court

Hirschberg, P. J. :

The plaintiff was seriously injured on December 1?,. 1902, while riding on one of the defendant’s horse cars on Avenue A, in the vicinity -of Second street, in the borough of Manhattan; He was a conductor in the defendant’s employ, but had been laid off a few *135■days before because of illness, but had received on the day of the accident a physician’s certificate, required by the defendant’s rules, Attesting that he would be able to resume his duties - on December ■eighteenth. He boarded one of the defendant’s cars on the day of the accident and was allowed to ride free…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ross v. . New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1878

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Howes v. Stark Bros. Nurseries & Orchards Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Claim of Kowalek v. New York Consolidated RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
  3. Falk v. HavemeyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  4. Pierson v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.New York Supreme Court · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API