Mason v. Phelps
Michigan Supreme Court
Motion to strike out exceptions.
1Per curiam
Motion by plaintiffs in error to strike out exceptions as being unlawfully settled, and to remand the case for a new trial because the exceptions cannot now be settled. The facts are that the case was tried by a circuit judge who soon afterwards went out of office, and the bill of exceptions was settled by his successor. The parties agreed entirely on the form of the bill, and there is no complaint of error in it.
The statute (Laws of 1879, p. 5), expressly provides for the settlement of exceptions by the successor of the judge who tried the case, under circumstances like these. If the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Miller v. Mutual Benefit Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
- Lawrence v. BarkerNew York Supreme Court · 1830
- Davenport v. MasonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1818
- Mott v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1848
- City of Ripon v. BittelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bendett v. BendettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- State v. LeggWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1906
- People v. HolmesMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
- Pressley v. Wayne County SheriffMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
- Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co. v. KendallCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.