Legal Opinion

Williamson v. Mitchell Auto Company

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 6, 1930PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, C. J.,

(after stating the facts). In the absence of a bill of exceptions and since the recitation in the judgment is that the difference between the value of the automobile at the date of the commencement of the suit and at the date of the trial is $125, the presumption is that the evidence adduced at the trial sustained the finding of the circuit court and warranted the judgment rendered if within the issues raised by the pleadings. Strode v. Holland, 150 Ark. 122, 233 S. W. 1073 ; McKinney v. First National Bank of Batesville, 152 Ark. 403, 238 S. W. 629 ; Coblentz & Logsden v. L. D.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Coblentz & Logsdon v. L. D. Powell Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
  2. Strode v. HollandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
  3. Commercial Investment Trust v. FormanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  4. Commercial Credit Co. v. StanleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
  5. Love v. HoffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brooks, Receiver v. Wooten-Epes Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1941
  2. Dixie Life & Accident Insurance v. LeachSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
  3. McCarty v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API