Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Able v. Harden

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided May 28, 2021No. 5:21-cv-00131Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY CENTRAL DIVISION AT LEXINGTON CIVIL ACTION NO. 21-131-DLB CLAYTON ABLE PLAINTIFF v. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RENAE HARDEN and KAREN TOMBLIM DEFENDANTS *** *** *** *** Plaintiff Clayton Able is a resident of Cincinnati, Ohio. Able has filed a pro se civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. # 1). The Court has granted his motion to proceed in forma pauperis by separate Order. The Court must review the Complaint prior to service of process and dismiss any claim that is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Hill v. LappinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  3. Davis v. Prison Health ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  4. Dorothy Johnson v. Memphis Light, Gas & Water Div.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
  5. Bonner v. PerryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API