Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Stump

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided January 15, 1876PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court. cited Redf. "Wills, p. 228 ; Hess’ Appeal, 48 Penn. St., 73 ; Harrison vs. Rowan, 3 Wash. Ot. Ct., 585; Harvey vs. Sullens, 46 Mo., 147; Harrel vs. Harrel, 1 DuYall [Ky.,] 203. cited Harvey vs. Heirs of Sullens, 56 Mo., 872.

1Opinion of the Court

Napton. Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is a suit, under our statute, brought by the heirs of a deceased daughter of John Stump by his first wife, against an infant daughter of said Stump by his second wife, to have the will of said Stump, which had been previously admitted to probate, set aside and declared null. The son by the first wife, David M. Stump, was also made a party defendant, bufas he was acting as guardian of the infant defendant, and was interested in having the will set aside, a guardian ad litem of the infant daughter was appointed. The suit was instituted…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rogers v. Troost's Admr.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1873

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. New York Building-Loan Banking Co.New York Supreme Court · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API