Forderer v. Schmidt
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, Circuit Judge
Error is assigned to the instructions given by the court on the subject of the tender. In 2 Parsons on Contracts (9th Ed.) 639, it is said of a tender: “It need not be made by the defendant personally. If made by a third person at his request it is sufficient, and, if made by a stranger without his knowledge or request, it seems that a subsequent assent of the debtor would operate as a ratification and make the tender good.”
The language of the text is supported by reference to Harding v. Davies, 2 C. & P. 78, Read v. Goldring, 2 M. & S. 86, and Kinkaid v. Brunswick, 11 Me. 188. In the case…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bennett v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Tacey v. IrwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Atwood v. WeemsSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Kincaid v. School District No. 4Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1834
3Cited by6 opinions
- Saticoy Bay LLC Series 9050 W Warm Springs 2079 v. Nev. Ass'n Servs.Nevada Supreme Court · 2019
- Backus v. WestOregon Supreme Court · 1922
- Long v. ZirkleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
- E. J. Struntz Planing Mill Co. v. PagetOregon Supreme Court · 1927
- North Coast Mortgage Investment, Inc. v. DunningCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.