Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Aurora Consolidated Health Care & Sentry Insurance v. Labor & Industry Review Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 2012No. 2010AP208PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnn Walsh Bradley, J.

¶ 1. The petitioners, Aurora Consolidated Health Care and Sentry Insurance, A Mutual Company (collectively, "Aurora") seek review of a decision of the court of appeals, which upheld a decision of the Labor and Industry Review Commission (LIRC) determining that Jeffrey Schaefer was permanently and totally disabled as a result of a work injury.1 LIRC made this determination after denying Aurora's last-minute request to cross-examine or make further inquires of Dr. Jerome Ebert, an independent physician appointed by the Department of Workforce Development (the Department) to examine Schaefer and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Dixon v. LoveSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Racine Harley-Davidson, Inc. v. State Division of Hearings & AppealsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Hagen v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. Fernando Ortiz-MondragonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Turnpaugh v. State Claims BoardCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2012
  3. Grede Foundries, Inc. v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2012
  4. State v. Fernando Ortiz-MondragonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
  5. State v. Fernando Ortiz-MondragonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API