Legal Opinion

Louangmilith v. Noem

District Court, S.D. California

Decided October 9, 2025No. 3:25-cv-02502Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SIRIPHONE LOUANGMILITH, Case No.: 25-cv-2502-JES-MSB 12 Petitioner, ORDER: 13 v. (1) DENYING IN PART AND 14 KRISTI NOEM; PAMELA JO BONDI; GRANTING IN PART PETITION TODD M. LYONS; JESUS ROCHA; and 15 FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS; CHRISTOPHER LaROSE, and 16 Respondents. 17 (2) DENYING MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING 18 ORDER AS MOOT 19 [ECF Nos. 1, 3] 20 21 22 Before the Court is Petitioner Siriphone Louangmilith’s Petition for Writ of Habeas 23 Corpus pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2241

(ECF No. 1), and accompanying…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hamdi v. RumsfeldSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. United States v. GoodingSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  4. Espinoza v. SabolCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
  5. Chhoeun v. MarinDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API