Legal Opinion

Bearup v. Cintas Corporation

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided July 30, 2025No. 1:21-cv-00151Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION - CINCINNATI THOMAS BEARUP, et al., : Case No. 1:21-cv-151 Plaintiffs, Judge Matthew W. McFarland CINTAS CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (Doc. 110) This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Catherine McGovern’s Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. 110). Defendants filed a Response in Opposition (Doc. 113), to which Plaintiff filed a Reply in Support (Doc. 114). Thus, this matter is ripe for the Court’s review. For the reasons below, Plaintiff's Motion for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Crown, Cork & Seal Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. William Harmon v. Csx Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  4. Offill v. Pennsylvania Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API