Milliner v. New York City Housing Authority
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Dismissal of the complaint was appropriate since plaintiff as*384sumed the risks inherent in playing basketball outdoors (see Sykes v County of Erie, 94 NY2d 912 [2000]; LaSalvia v City of New York, 305 AD2d 267 [2003]; McKey v City of New York, 234 AD2d 114 [1996]). The evidence establishes that plaintiff, an experienced basketball player who was familiar with the subject court’s playing surface and its depressions, slipped in a puddle of water and fell. Indeed, plaintiff acknowledged that he had been playing on the court for about an hour and a half prior to his fall and was aware of the puddle.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Diaz v. New York Downtown HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Sykes v. County of ErieNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- McKey v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Parris v. Port of New York AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- LaSalvia v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
3Cited by3 opinions
- Astor v. Young Men's & Young Women's Hebrew Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Austion v. Parkchester South Condominium, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Austion v. Parkchester South Condominium, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013