Legal Opinion
Mintz v. Allen
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 14, 1966No. 65 Civ. 3814PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EDELSTEIN, District Judge.
This is a shareholders derivative action against the defendant mutual fund and its directors and investment advisers pursuant to the Investment Company Act of 1940. Plaintiffs also seek recovery for alleged violations of state law and common law fiduciary duties. The jurisdiction of the state and common law claims is asserted as pendent to the Investment Company Act claims.
Petitioner (the mutual fund defendant in the underlying action) moves for an order compelling plaintiffs to post $50,- 000 security pursuant to § 627 of the New York Business Corporation…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Baltimore Steamship Co. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Saylor v. LindsleyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
- System Operations, Inc. v. Scientific Games Development Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Kristiansen v. John Mullins & Sons, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1973
- Marks v. CalendineDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1978
- Weisfeld v. Spartans Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1972
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.