State Ex Rel. Mobil Corp. v. Gaughan
West Virginia Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Petitioner Mobil Corporation 1 seeks extraordinary relief from a February 26, 2002, Trial Scheduling Order 2 entered by the Circuit Court of Kanawha County in connection with certain asbestos-based personal injury cases that have been amassed under West Virginia Trial Court Rule (“TCR”) 26.01. Mobil argues that the procedures contemplated by the lower court in connection with bringing the asbestos eases to trial will, as a matter of certainty, result in a denial of its Due Process rights if trials ensue under the outlined, but as yet unfinalized, trial procedures. Upon our full review of this…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Ortiz v. Fibreboard Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- State Ex Rel. Hoover v. BergerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
- Maximo HILAO, Class Plaintiffs, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ESTATE OF Ferdinand MARCOS, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- State Ex Rel. Appalachian Power Co. v. MacQueenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- In Re West Virginia Rezulin LitigationWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2003
- State ex rel. McCaffery v. HutchisonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2003
- State Ex Rel. Termnet Merchant Services, Inc. v. JordanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2005
- State Ex Rel. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. KaufmanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2008
- In Re Tobacco LitigationWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.