State v. Blanton
Supreme Court of Alabama
1DissentHarwood, Justice
I respectfully dissent from the quashing of this writ. First, although I believe that the denial of the petition as proeedurally insufficient would be correct for the reasons I will explain in this dissent, I believe that an opinion by this Court discussing those reasons would have been appropriate under this Court’s rule-making authority. Second, I believe that an opinion by this Court would also have been appropriate to address the denial of the underlying petition for a writ of mandamus by the Court of Criminal Appeals, because I believe that the Court of Criminal Appeals did not have…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., County of RiversideSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Nunn v. BakerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
- Ex Parte StewartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
- Hagood v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.