Howard v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
The certiorari sought review of the decision by the Court of Appeals in Charlie Howard v. State of Alabama, 194 So. 853.
We are in accord with the decision rendered. It is perhaps unnecessary to add thereto. However, it is urged that refused charges present error.
Refused charges 1 and 6 are fully-covered by the oral charge and the opinion of the Court of Appeals. This was sufficient. Orr v. State, 236 Ala. 462, 183 So. 445.
Refused charge 9 as set out in the record is incomplete by the omission of the material word “suffering.”
Refused charge 15 was properly refused as not fully…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Gibson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
- Storey v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
- Bluett v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
- Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Brown v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1946
- Clements v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1980
- Camp v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978
- Suggs v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1951
- Bowman v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1950
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.